How SHR’s Closure Led to a NASCAR Silly Season Domino Effect

CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA - JUNE 21: (L-R) Chief competition officer Greg Zipadelli, co-owner Tony Stewart, driver Josh Berry, driver Kevin Harvick and crew chief Rodney Childers answer questions during a press conference announcing Berry will drive the #4 Stewart-Hass Racing Ford Mustang in 2024 at Charlotte Motor Speedway on June 21, 2023 in Concord, North Carolina. (Photo by Grant Halverson/Getty Images)

What’s Happening?

NASCAR Silly Season tends to create a domino effect of driver moves, promotions, demotions, and expansions. This year, one storyline, the closure of Stewart-Haas Racing, single-handedly affected several teams and drivers’ plans for 2025. So, here’s the domino effect of Stewart-Haas Racing’s closure on NASCAR Silly Season.

  • A domino effect is the idea that one change can affect others, much like dominoes in a line falling and toppling over the next one in the line.
  • Prior to its close, Stewart-Haas Racing had four cars and four Charters. This season, the team sold off three Charters and replaced its entire Cup Series lineup.
  • The Stewart-Haas Racing domino effect came from three sources: driver moves, their Xfinity Series team, promotions/demotions, and Charter sales.

Driver’s Moving Up, Down and Around

When SHR first announced its closure in May, most fans were interested in how their Charters would be distributed. The sale of these Charters would allow established and up-and-coming teams the opportunity to add a third or potentially fourth car to their lineup.

However, one aspect slightly overlooked due to the importance of these Charters is, of course, the demolition of SHR’s Cup Series lineup. We’ll start with the driver moves in the Cup Series, as these were the least consequential dominos overall.

For example, Ryan Preece did not necessarily displace any driver; rather, he took an already expanding spot with RFK Racing. Chase Briscoe replaced a driver. However, that driver, Martin Truex Jr, was more than likely going to retire at year’s end. This move is similar to what Noah Gragson did. His domino effect on free agency resulted in Gragson taking over Michael McDowell’s spot at Front-Row Motorsports. However, McDowell was already heading to Spire Motorsports, a team we will return to momentarily.

In fact, the only driver who had a decent domino effect was Josh Berry’s free agency. After driving the No.4 in 2024, Berry announced he would head to Wood Brothers Racing and the No. 21 in 2025. The resulting domino effect saw Harrison Burton out at WBR. Burton landed on his feet in the Xfinity series, with AM Racing replacing the released Hailie Deegan.

Swapping Charters

Of the three Charters sold from SHR, one has a long domino effect on driver moves, while the other two are part of a long, unwinding storyline that could flow into next season.

First, Trackhouse Racing purchased a charter to expand to three teams in the NASCAR Cup series. In doing so, they called up Shane Van Gisbergen from Kaulig Racing’s Xfinity Series program. Trackhouse also released Zane Smith from his developmental deal, where he was racing for Spire Motorsports, which inadvertently could have pulled Michael McDowell out of his FRM ride for Noah Gragson.

However, the dominoes from this purchase continue to fall in the Xfinity Series, where Kaulig Racing signed Daniel Dye to replace Shane Van Gisbergen in the Xfinity Series. Dye’s move left an open ride in the Truck Series that may have been filled this week by Connor Mosack.

At McAnally-Hilgemann Racing, Dye drove the No. 43. However, MHR already announced that Mosack would drive the new No. 81, retaining Dye’s Crew Chief. This perhaps continues the legacy of the No. 43 under a new number. Maybe this is where the domino effect stops for this charter.

The other two Charters were agreed to be purchased by Front Row Motorsports and 23XI Racing. However, both these Charters are entirely up in the air as neither the purchase nor the transfer has gone through. This is due to an ongoing antitrust lawsuit between the two teams and NASCAR, in which the teams could lose their Charters, including these two SHR charters. NASCAR recently claimed they will not transfer these Charters to the teams. However, a preliminary injunction could change this.

Prior to the lawsuit, both teams planned their expansions, leading to preparations for both teams to field a third car in 2025. This led to the hiring of Riley Herbst at 23XI and perhaps a return for Zane Smith to FRM in 2025. Herbst, much like Smith, was already a free agent thanks to the domino effect of SHR’s closure.

The Xfinity Shuffle

When SHR initially announced its closure in May, most expected the team to sell all four Charters. However, co-owner Gene Haas announced he would hold onto a Charter and the team’s two-car Xfinity Series program for the future. This new team, known as the Haas Factory Team, would entirely reset the SHR Xfinity lineups for 2025.

The first confirmed move was that Cole Custer would move from the team‘s No. 00 Xfinity car to their single-car Cup Series team in 2025. Furthermore, the HFT announced Riley Herbst would not return to the Xfinity Series team in 2025, making him a free agent for 23XI.

The domino effect here is that Sheldon Creed of Joe Gibbs Racing and Sam Mayer of JR Motorsports would leave their rides for the two HFT Xfinity cars. These moves gave two top prospects the opportunity to race in the Xfinity Series in 2025. JGR signed top prospect William Sawalich to drive the No. 18 in 2025. JRM, without Mayer, finally had room for top prospect Carson Kvapil to drive the No. 1 next season.

While some of these moves would have happened either way, these are just small details. They show how one major move can affect the entirety of NASCAR Silly Season. Furthermore, the domino effect of SHR’s closure will continue after Silly Season is done and into the future.

What do you think about this? Let us know your opinions on Discord or X, and don’t forget that you can also follow us on InstagramFacebook, and YouTube.

Share this:

Michael Jordan’s NASCAR Impact | Driver Approvals Questioned After Decker, Cleetus Crash At Daytona

It wouldn’t be Daytona without some weird, wacky, and headline-grabbing fallout. From viral Victory Lane moments to renewed debates about driver approval, NASCAR’s biggest race once again delivered more than just on-track drama. And with Michael Jordan celebrating a Daytona 500 win, the spotlight burned brighter than it has in years.

  • Did Michael Jordan’s raw, emotional Victory Lane reaction create the most mainstream positive buzz NASCAR has seen since 2020?
  • Why did one viral clip take on a life of its own, even after Tyler Reddick addressed it publicly?
  • Has the Natalie Decker crash reignited serious concerns about NASCAR’s driver approval process?
  • And where should the line be drawn between marketing power, opportunity, and competitive fairness?

Jordan’s presence mattered. When the most iconic athlete of a generation shows genuine emotion upon winning the Daytona 500, it reminds the wider sports world that this race still matters. That kind of authentic publicity cannot be manufactured. It resonated far beyond the garage. Meanwhile, the O’Reilly Series race added fuel to another ongoing debate. The massive Decker crash, Cleetus McFarland’s Truck debut incident, and past approval inconsistencies have once again raised tough questions. Consistency, transparency, and accountability are now front and center. Add in Austin Hill’s dominance and Ryan Ellis’ career-best sixth-place run to open the season, and Daytona gave fans plenty to talk about on and off the track.

Watch Also

Adam Petty’s Brief Bright Career Ended in Heartbreak

On May 12, 2000, the NASCAR world arrived at New Hampshire International Speedway expecting another race weekend. Within hours, Adam Petty was gone. His death would become the first domino in an 18-month stretch that forever changed NASCAR’s approach to safety and reshaped the sport at its core.

  • How did a suspected throttle issue in Turn 3 at New Hampshire International Speedway take the life of 19-year-old Adam Petty?
  • Why were officials and team members unable to recreate the malfunction afterward?
  • Did this tragedy expose deeper safety flaws that had gone unaddressed?
  • And how did this moment mark the beginning of NASCAR’s most devastating modern era?

Adam wasn’t just the grandson of Richard Petty or the son of Kyle Petty; he was a young driver building his own path, fresh off his Cup debut at Texas Motor Speedway and preparing for a future with Dodge and Petty Enterprises. His passing stunned the garage and deeply impacted fans who saw the Petty family as part of their own. From the unanswered mechanical questions to the emotional aftermath that eventually led to the creation of Victory Junction, this is where the Firestorm begins. The fear, the controversy, and the transformation of NASCAR safety all trace back to that Friday in Loudon.

Watch Also

Does NASCAR Need Better Quality Control?

The O’Reilly series race at Daytona turned into a breaking point. One crash, one late reaction, and suddenly the conversation wasn’t just about race results, it was about standards, accountability, and who truly belongs at this level of NASCAR competition.

  • After the crash involving Natalie Decker and Sam Mayer, is this just another racing mistake, or proof that NASCAR needs stricter quality control before drivers reach national series events?
  • Was NASCAR right to previously deny Mike Wallace a Daytona 500 start at Daytona International Speedway, even with his experience?
  • Does Chris Wright’s repeated inexperience at high-speed tracks show a flaw in how seats are earned?
  • And where does Cleetus McFarland fit, promising upside, but possibly moving up too quickly?

The Decker incident reignited long-standing perception issues, especially when outside commentary from figures like Mike Davis amplified the embarrassment factor. At the same time, NASCAR has stepped in before, blocking Wallace, sidelining others like Jennifer Jo Cobb, yet those interventions feel inconsistent. Wright’s pit road mistake added fuel to the argument that funding can outweigh readiness. McFarland, meanwhile, represents a different case, raw but potentially coachable, with time to develop if he chooses that route seriously. Money has always shaped racing careers, but when sponsorship outweighs preparation, the sport risks its credibility. Should NASCAR tighten its standards, or is this simply the cost of doing business in modern motorsports?

Watch Also