The NASCAR antitrust trial is barreling toward the finish, and today’s testimony added fuel to a case that is already running hot. Jim France was more awake, more vocal, and more willing to defend NASCAR’s decisions, but attorney Jeffrey Kessler kept pressing until the calm exterior cracked. Add in John Probst, who dove deep into the Next Gen car with the confidence of an engineer who knows every bolt, and this session delivered some of the most revealing moments yet.
- Why did Jim France suddenly open up more today after barely speaking yesterday?
- How did Kessler use France’s own words against him in a near mic drop courtroom moment?
- What surprising spending numbers did John Probst reveal about the Next Gen car?
- And how did Probst push back when teams argued NASCAR’s control of the car is anti-competitive?
This video breaks down how France tried to present himself as a consensus builder while Kessler methodically chipped away at that image, eventually cornering him into an “I don’t know how to answer that” moment that drew eyes across the courtroom. It also dives into Probst’s firm defense of the single-source parts system, the cost-cutting goals behind the Next Gen, and why the teams’ spending habits became part of NASCAR’s argument. If you’re trying to make sense of which side is landing cleaner punches as the trial nears its end, this is a must-watch.
Watch Also



