NASCAR recently unveiled the new NASCAR Productions/Studios building. The 58,000-square-foot facility includes three studios, eight control rooms, and four broadcast booths. The studio will be home to plenty of NASCAR social media content, but, some fans are not happy about what it means for broadcasting.
Saving Money
The main reason behind NASCAR going towards remote broadcasts is to save money. Sending an entire broadcast and production crew to a race is an expensive endeavor. The costs include food, lodging, transportation for the workers, and transporting all of the equipment. The cost adds up over a 38-race season.
What NASCAR, and many other sports are beginning to do, is keep as many elements of the broadcast as they can off-site. Cameras and camera operators need to be on-site, but a remote control room and broadcast booth move some of the production staff and production equipment off-site. This means NASCAR does not have to spend the money to send everyone out to a race track week after week.
Less Travel For Crew
Another benefit to remote broadcasts is less travel for crews. This is likely a secondary reason to cost, but, it’s still worth noting.
The NASCAR schedule is a grind, and being far from home for 35 or so weekends a year is exhausting for everyone involved. Remote broadcasts allow workers to drive in to work, produce a broadcast, and head back home the same day. It’s more like a typical 9-5 job. However, that doesn’t make remote broadcasts popular.
Broadcasters Not on Site
Having a control room off-site is likely not as big of a deal to fans. That can barely be noticed on a broadcast, but, the announcers being off-site is very noticeable.
When announcers are off-site, they cannot feed off of the atmosphere at the race track. They are also watching the race on a TV screen instead of with their own eyes. This makes their job tougher because they cannot take advantage of seeing and feeling everything at the race track.
LtxResistance brought up that he notices a drop-off in quality when announcers are not on-site.
When 2025 comes, NASCAR will be producing more of its own content. NASCAR will be in charge of producing the Xfinity Series, and, that means there will likely be even more remote broadcasts in the future for the series. This concerns fans like Chrome Diesel.
Regardless of how fans feel, remote broadcasts are a part of NASCAR’s future. It seems it will happen more often, and, not everyone is a fan of it.
After two wildcards to kick off the 2026 season, NASCAR headed to Circuit of the Americas (COTA) for round 3 on the year. The big headline heading into this weekend was whether or not Tyler Reddick could become the first driver in NASCAR history to win three straight races to start a campaign. Three times before, drivers have won the first two races of the year. Now Reddick, fresh off the heels of a Daytona 500 win and a win at Atlanta makes history as the only driver to go three for three.
The No. 45 23XI team is certainly on a roll with a 70-point points lead. However, not everyone had a weekend to remember. Here are the biggest losers of the 2026 NASCAR race weekend at COTA.
Another race weekend, another controversial race for Hendrick Motorsports’ Corey Day. And it is, yet again, a tangle with a JR Motorsports car that lands him on this list. Late into Saturday’s O’Reilly Auto Parts Series race at COTA, Corey Day got into his Hendrick teammate, Connor Zilisch, who was driving the No. 1 car for the team, causing Zilisch to spin out. Up to that point, Zilisch had already overcome a lot of adversity. Heading into one of the tight corners of COTA, Day clipped Zilisch, sending him around and effectively ending his contention for the race win.
After the incident, Connor Zilisch came over the radio and called Day a “total hack” and then, after the race, told reporters that he expects and deserves an apology. Day was a good sport about it all, owning up to his mistakes. But it’s just another week of Day barreling through his competitors that makes this a weekend he’d likely rather forget. To his credit, though, despite the issues, he still managed a top 5 finish. So, at least there’s that.
Unfortunately, Connor Zilisch makes the list. There was a lot of buzz around Connor Zilisch heading into the weekend, considering his dominance on road courses last year in the O’Reilly Auto Parts Series. I think that many fans viewed Saturday’s race as a cakewalk for the young phenom, while others thought that the odds were in his favor to capture his first win on Sunday. Unfortunately for him, none of that came to fruition. While Saturday’s race looked like another SVG/Connor Zilisch thriller in the making, mechanical issues put the driver of the No. 1 car behind the 8-ball. Not to mention a late race incident with Corey Day and Saturday could be considered the win that could have been for Zilisch.
Sunday wasn’t much better. He did manage to keep his nose clean, so there was that. But he was more or less a non-factor most of the race. He started in the back and was able to work his way up and contend for a top 10 finish in the closing laps. Unfortunately, all he could manage was a 14th-place finish.
Undeniably, the odds-on favorite going into today’s race had to be the one, the only, the NASCAR King of the Road himself, Shane van Gisbergen. Despite win-and-you’re-in being a thing of the past, many fan still expect SVG to make the 16-driver Chase for the Cup later this year based on sheer wins at road course races alone. His first opportunity came early with COTA being the third race of the season. Unfortunately, despite winning handily in the O’Reilly Auto Parts Series race on Saturday, he wasn’t able to get the job done on Sunday. He was in prime position to win his seventh career cup win but, unfortunately, the stars didn’t align. He was forced to settle for a runner-up finish.
The story going into this weekend’s race at COTA was will Tyler Reddick be able to do the impossible and become the first driver in history to win the first three races of the season. It was a tall order, for sure, but the fact that he scored the pole on Saturday must have put a pep in his step. Early on, he was far from the fastest. As the race wore on, though, he got better and better, ultimately able to outduel the King of the Road, SVG on his own turf.
Because of Reddick’s dominant performance, the last loser on our list this week is the rest of the NASCAR Cup Series field. They just did not rise to the occasion, and Tyler Reddick managed to capitalize to make history. Now, they just need to go to Phoenix next week and prevent him from going four in a row. At this rate, though, Reddick might actually embarrass the field once again.
What do you think about this? Let us know your opinion on Discord or X. Don’t forget that you can also follow us on Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube.
In this post, we’re breaking down the top 10 all-time lap leaders at Circuit of the Americas, along with key stats, besides reviewing the top 15 active drivers with the most laps led at the track. And that’s not all; we’re also examining some of COTA’s historic track records and the names still holding them, so stick around until the end to check them out
| Races | Laps Run | Wins | Poles | Avg. Finish | Avg. Start |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 456 | 2 | 3 | 4.0 | 2.0 |
| Races | Laps Run | Wins | Poles | Avg. Finish | Avg. Start |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 456 | 1 | 2 | 7.3 | 9.3 |
| Races | Laps Run | Wins | Poles | Avg. Finish | Avg. Start |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 456 | 0 | 0 | 11.0 | 13.7 |
| Races | Laps Run | Wins | Poles | Avg. Finish | Avg. Start |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 454 | 1 | 0 | 10.5 | 10.8 |
| Races | Laps Run | Wins | Poles | Avg. Finish | Avg. Start |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 258 | 0 | 0 | 9.3 | 10.3 |
| Races | Laps Run | Wins | Poles | Avg. Finish | Avg. Start |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 418 | 1 | 0 | 13.0 | 10.3 |
| Races | Laps Run | Wins | Poles | Avg. Finish | Avg. Start |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 456 | 0 | 0 | 18.7 | 17.5 |
| Races | Laps Run | Wins | Poles | Avg. Finish | Avg. Start |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 456 | 0 | 0 | 19.0 | 15.2 |
| Races | Laps Run | Wins | Poles | Avg. Finish | Avg. Start |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 403 | 0 | 0 | 29.3 | 11.5 |
| Races | Laps Run | Wins | Poles | Avg. Finish | Avg. Start |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 456 | 0 | 0 | 13.8 | 17.5 |
Let us know your thoughts on this list. Are there any drivers that surprise you? What track record do you think will never be broken? Join the discussion on Discord or X, and remember to follow us on Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube for more updates.
Winning in NASCAR is no small feat. Nearly 3,000 drivers have competed in the premier American motorsports series, but only 206 have reached Victory Lane. Of those, just 140 have won multiple races. In this post, we’ll break down every driver who has claimed a win at the top level of stock car racing. In addition, we’re also listing every single champion, crown jewel, and exhibition race winner.
| Rank | Driver Name | Wins | Win Rate | Seasons W/Win | Crown Jewels | All-Star Wins | Clash Wins | Titles | Championship Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richard Petty | 200 | 16.6% | 23 | 10💎 | 7 🏆 | 1964, 67, 71, 72, 74, 75, 79 | ||
| 2 | David Pearson | 105 | 18.2% | 18 | 7💎 | 3 🏆 | 1966, 68, 69 | ||
| 3 | Jeff Gordon | 93 | 11.5% | 20 | 17💎 | 3⭐ | 2⚔️ | 4 🏆 | 1995, 97, 98, 2001 |
| 4 | Bobby Allison | 85 | 11.8% | 20 | 10💎 | 1⚔️ | 1 🏆 | 1983 | |
| 5 | Darrell Waltrip | 84 | 10.4% | 17 | 7💎 | 1⭐ | 1⚔️ | 3 🏆 | 1981, 82, 85 |
| T6 | Cale Yarborough | 83 | 14.8% | 18 | 9💎 | 3 🏆 | 1976, 77, 78 | ||
| T6 | JIMMIE JOHNSON | 83 | ≈11.8% | 16 | 12💎 | 4⭐ | 2⚔️ | 7 🏆 | 2006, 07, 08, 09, 10, 13, 16 |
| 8 | Dale Earnhardt | 76 | 11.2% | 20 | 8💎 | 3⭐ | 6⚔️ | 7 🏆 | 1980, 86, 87, 90, 91, 93, 94 |
| 9 | KYLE BUSCH | 63 | ≈8.7% | 19 | 4💎 | 1⭐ | 2⚔️ | 2 🏆 | 2015, 19 |
| T10 | Kevin Harvick | 60 | 7.2% | 18 | 8💎 | 2⭐ | 3⚔️ | 1 🏆 | 2014 |
| T10 | DENNY HAMLIN | 60 | ≈8.0% | 19 | 7💎 | 4⚔️ | |||
| 12 | Rusty Wallace | 55 | 7.7% | 17 | 1💎 | 1⭐ | 1⚔️ | 1 🏆 | 1989 |
| 13 | Lee Petty | 54 | 12.6% | 13 | 1💎 | 3 🏆 | 1954, 58, 59 | ||
| T14 | Junior Johnson | 50 | 15.9% | 9 | 1💎 | ||||
| T14 | Ned Jarrett | 50 | 14.2% | 7 | 1💎 | 2 🏆 | 1961, 65 | ||
| 16 | Tony Stewart | 49 | 7.9% | 16 | 2💎 | 1⭐ | 3⚔️ | 3 🏆 | 2002, 05, 11 |
| 17 | Herb Thomas | 48 | 20.9% | 7 | 3💎 | 2 🏆 | 1951, 53 | ||
| 18 | Buck Baker | 46 | 7.2% | 12 | 3💎 | 2 🏆 | 1956, 57 | ||
| 19 | Bill Elliott | 44 | 5.3% | 13 | 6💎 | 1⭐ | 1⚔️ | 1 🏆 | 1988 |
| 20 | Mark Martin | 40 | 4.5% | 15 | 3💎 | 2⭐ | 1⚔️ | ||
| T21 | Matt Kenseth | 39 | 5.6% | 14 | 4💎 | 1⭐ | 1⚔️ | 1 🏆 | 2003 |
| T21 | Tim Flock | 39 | 20.8% | 6 | 2 🏆 | 1952, 55 | |||
| T23 | Bobby Isaac | 37 | 12.0% | 6 | 1 🏆 | 1970 | |||
| T23 | JOEY LOGANO | 37 | ≈6.1% | 15 | 1💎 | 2⭐ | 2⚔️ | 3 🏆 | 2018, 22, 24 |
| 25 | BRAD KESELOWSKI | 36 | ≈6.3% | 13 | 3💎 | 1⚔️ | 1 🏆 | 2012 | |
| T26 | Kurt Busch | 34 | 4.3% | 19 | 2💎 | 1⭐ | 1⚔️ | 1 🏆 | 2004 |
| T26 | Martin Truex Jr | 34 | 4.9% | 10 | 3💎 | 1⚔️ | 1 🏆 | 2017 | |
| 28 | Fireball Roberts | 33 | 16.0% | 10 | 3💎 | ||||
| T29 | Dale Jarrett | 32 | 4.7% | 13 | 6💎 | 3⚔️ | 1 🏆 | 1999 | |
| T29 | KYLE LARSON | 32 | ≈8.0% | 8 | 3💎 | 3⭐ | 2 🏆 | 2021, 2025 | |
| T31 | Carl Edwards | 28 | 6.2% | 9 | 2💎 | 1⭐ | |||
| T31 | Rex White | 28 | 12.0% | 5 | 1 🏆 | 1960 | |||
| T33 | Dale Earnhardt Jr | 26 | 4.1% | 11 | 2💎 | 1⭐ | 2⚔️ | ||
| T33 | Fred Lorenzen | 26 | 16.4% | 7 | 3💎 | ||||
| T35 | Jim Paschal | 25 | 5.9% | 11 | 2💎 | ||||
| T35 | Joe Weatherly | 25 | 10.8% | 5 | 2 🏆 | 1962, 63 | |||
| 37 | Ricky Rudd | 23 | 2.5% | 18 | 1💎 | ||||
| 38 | Terry Labonte | 22 | 2.4% | 15 | 2💎 | 2⭐ | 1⚔️ | 2 🏆 | 1984, 96 |
| T39 | Benny Parsons | 21 | 3.9% | 10 | 2💎 | 1 🏆 | 1973 | ||
| T39 | Bobby Labonte | 21 | 2.8% | 9 | 3💎 | 1 🏆 | 2000 | ||
| T39 | Jack Smith | 21 | 7.9% | 7 | |||||
| T39 | Jeff Burton | 21 | 3.0% | 8 | 3💎 | ||||
| T39 | CHASE ELLIOTT | 21 | ≈5.7% | 7 | 1⭐ | 1⚔️ | 1 🏆 | 2020 | |
| 43 | Speedy Thompson | 20 | 10.1% | 6 | 1💎 | ||||
| T44 | Buddy Baker | 19 | 2.7% | 11 | 5💎 | 1⚔️ | |||
| T44 | Davey Allison | 19 | 9.9% | 7 | 2💎 | 2⭐ | |||
| T44 | Fonty Flock | 19 | 12.3% | 6 | 1💎 | ||||
| T44 | Greg Biffle | 19 | 3.6% | 9 | 2💎 | ||||
| T49 | Geoffrey Bodine | 18 | 3.1% | 10 | 1💎 | 1⭐ | 1⚔️ | ||
| T49 | Harry Gant | 18 | 3.8% | 8 | 2💎 | ||||
| T49 | Kasey Kahne | 18 | 3.4% | 9 | 4💎 | 1⭐ | |||
| T49 | Neil Bonnett | 18 | 4.9% | 9 | 3💎 | 2⚔️ | |||
| T49 | Ryan Newman | 18 | 2.4% | 10 | 2💎 | 1⭐ | |||
| T54 | Curtis Turner | 17 | 9.2% | 9 | 1💎 | ||||
| T54 | Marvin Panch | 17 | 7.8% | 7 | 2💎 | ||||
| T56 | RYAN BLANEY | 17 | ≈3.7% | 8 | 1💎 | 1⭐ | 1 🏆 | 2023 | |
| T56 | WILLIAM BYRON | 16 | ≈5.6% | 6 | 2💎 | ||||
| T57 | Ernie Irvan | 15 | 4.7% | 7 | 1 | ||||
| T58 | Dick Hutcherson | 14 | 13.5% | 3 | |||||
| T58 | LeeRoy Yarbrough | 14 | 7.0% | 6 | 3💎 | ||||
| T60 | Dick Rathmann | 13 | 10.0% | 3 | |||||
| T60 | Tim Richmond | 13 | 7.0% | 5 | 1💎 | ||||
| T60 | CHRISTOPHER BELL | 13 | ≈6.4% | 5 | 1💎 | 1⭐ | |||
| 62 | TYLER REDDICK | 11 | ≈4.7% | 4 | 1💎 | ||||
| T64 | Clint Bowyer | 10 | 1.8% | 6 | |||||
| T64 | Donnie Allison | 10 | 4.1% | 7 | 1💎 | ||||
| T64 | Sterling Marlin | 10 | 1.3% | 5 | 2💎 | ||||
| T67 | Bob Welborn | 9 | 4.9% | 3 | |||||
| T67 | Cotton Owens | 9 | 5.6% | 6 | |||||
| T67 | Paul Goldsmith | 9 | 7.0% | 4 | |||||
| T70 | ALEX BOWMAN | 8 | ≈2.4% | 5 | |||||
| T70 | Kyle Petty | 8 | 0.9% | 7 | 1💎 | ||||
| T73 | A.J. Foyt | 7 | 5.4% | 5 | 1💎 | ||||
| T73 | Darel Dieringer | 7 | 3.8% | 5 | 1💎 | ||||
| T73 | Jamie McMurray | 7 | 1.2% | 5 | 2💎 | 1⭐ | |||
| T73 | Jim Reed | 7 | 6.6% | 2 | 1💎 | ||||
| T73 | Marshall Teague | 7 | 30.4% | 2 | |||||
| T78 | AUSTIN DILLON | 6 | ≈1.2 | 6 | 2💎 | ||||
| T78 | CHRIS BUESCHER | 6 | ≈1.7% | 4 | |||||
| T78 | ROSS CHASTAIN | 6 | ≈2.1% | 4 | 1💎 | ||||
| T78 | SHANE VAN GISBERGEN | 6 | ≈14.0% | 2 | |||||
| T79 | Alan Kulwicki | 5 | 2.4% | 4 | 1 🏆 | 1992 | |||
| T79 | CHASE BRISCOE | 5 | ≈1.8% | 3 | 2💎 | ||||
| T79 | Dan Gurney | 5 | 0.5% | 5 | |||||
| T79 | Dave Marcis | 5 | 0.5% | 3 | |||||
| T79 | Jeremy Mayfield | 5 | 1.1% | 4 | |||||
| T79 | Ralph Moody | 5 | 10.6% | 2 | |||||
| T79 | Tiny Lund | 5 | 1.6% | 4 | 1💎 | ||||
| T79 | Ward Burton | 5 | 1.3% | 4 | 2💎 | ||||
| T88 | Billy Wade | 4 | 5.7% | 1 | |||||
| T88 | Bob Flock | 4 | 11.1% | 3 | |||||
| T88 | Bobby Hamilton | 4 | 1.0% | 4 | |||||
| T88 | Charlie Glotzbach | 4 | 3.2% | 3 | |||||
| T88 | Eddie Gray | 4 | 18.1% | 3 | |||||
| T88 | Eddie Pagan | 4 | 6.4% | 2 | |||||
| T88 | Glen Wood | 4 | 6.4% | 2 | |||||
| T88 | Hershel McGriff | 4 | 4.5% | 1 | |||||
| T88 | Joe Nemechek | 4 | 0.5% | 4 | |||||
| T88 | Ken Schrader | 4 | 0.5% | 3 | 2⚔️ | ||||
| T88 | Lloyd Dane | 4 | 7.6% | 3 | |||||
| T88 | Michael Waltrip | 4 | 0.5% | 3 | 2💎 | 1⭐ | |||
| T88 | Morgan Shepherd | 4 | 0.7% | 4 | |||||
| T88 | Nelson Stacy | 4 | 8.8% | 2 | 2💎 | ||||
| T88 | Pete Hamilton | 4 | 6.2% | 2 | 1💎 | ||||
| T88 | Parnelli Jones | 4 | 11.7% | 4 | |||||
| T88 | RICKY STENHOUSE JR | 4 | ≈0.9% | 3 | 1💎 | ||||
| T105 | AJ ALLMENDINGER | 3 | ≈0.6% | 3 | |||||
| T105 | Aric Almirola | 3 | 0.6% | 3 | |||||
| T105 | AUSTIN CINDRIC | 3 | ≈1.6% | 3 | 1💎 | ||||
| T105 | Bill Blair | 3 | 2.4% | 3 | |||||
| T105 | Brian Vickers | 3 | 0.9% | 3 | |||||
| T105 | BUBBA WALLACE | 3 | ≈0.7% | 3 | 1💎 | ||||
| T105 | Dick Linder | 3 | 10.7% | 1 | |||||
| T105 | Elliott Sadler | 3 | 0.6% | 2 | |||||
| T105 | ERIK JONES | 3 | ≈1.0% | 3 | 2💎 | 1⚔️ | |||
| T105 | Frank Mundy | 3 | 5.7% | 1 | |||||
| T105 | Gwyn Staley | 3 | 4.3% | 1 | |||||
| T105 | Robby Gordon | 3 | 0.7% | 2 | |||||
| T115 | Al Keller | 2 | 6.8% | 1 | |||||
| T115 | Billy Myers | 2 | 2.3% | 2 | |||||
| T115 | Bobby Johns | 2 | 1.4% | 2 | |||||
| T115 | DANIEL SUAREZ | 2 | ≈0.6% | 2 | |||||
| T115 | Danny Letner | 2 | 7.4% | 2 | |||||
| T115 | David Ragan | 2 | 0.4% | 2 | |||||
| T115 | David Reutimann | 2 | 0.8% | 2 | 1💎 | ||||
| T115 | Derrike Cope | 2 | 0.4% | 1 | 1💎 | ||||
| T115 | Elmo Langley | 2 | 0.3% | 1 | |||||
| T115 | Emanuel Zervakis | 2 | 2.4% | 1 | |||||
| T115 | Gober Sosebee | 2 | 2.8% | 2 | |||||
| T115 | James Hylton | 2 | 0.3% | 2 | |||||
| T115 | Jimmy Pardue | 2 | 0.9% | 2 | |||||
| T115 | Jimmy Spencer | 2 | 0.4% | 1 | |||||
| T115 | Joe Lee Johnson | 2 | 3.6% | 2 | 1💎 | ||||
| T115 | John Andretti | 2 | 0.5% | 2 | |||||
| T115 | Johnny Beauchamp | 2 | 8.6% | 2 | |||||
| T115 | Juan Pablo Montoya | 2 | 0.7% | 2 | |||||
| T115 | Marcos Ambrose | 2 | 0.8% | 2 | |||||
| T115 | Marvin Porter | 2 | 5.8% | 2 | |||||
| T115 | MICHAEL MCDOWELL | 2 | ≈0.3% | 2 | 1💎 | ||||
| T115 | Ray Elder | 2 | 6.4% | 2 | |||||
| T115 | Red Byron | 2 | 13.3% | 1 | 1 🏆 | 1949 | |||
| T115 | Ricky Craven | 2 | 0.7% | 2 | |||||
| T115 | Steve Park | 2 | 1.0% | 2 | |||||
| T115 | Tim Pistone | 2 | 1.5% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Art Watts | 1 | 5.2% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Bill Amick | 1 | 2.0% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Bill Norton | 1 | 25.0% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Bill Rexford | 1 | 2.7% | 1 | 1 🏆 | 1950 | |||
| T144 | Brett Bodine | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Bob Burdick | 1 | 6.6% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Bobby Hillin | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Buddy Shuman | 1 | 3.4% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Casey Mears | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 1💎 | ||||
| T144 | Chuck Stevenson | 1 | 50.0% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | COLE CUSTER | 1 | ≈0.8% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Danny Graves | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Danny Weinberg | 1 | 5.8% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Dick Brooks | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Dick Passwater | 1 | 5.0% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Donald Thomas | 1 | 1.2% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Earl Balmer | 1 | 3.1% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Earl Ross | 1 | 3.8% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Frankie Schneider | 1 | 3.7% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Greg Sacks | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Harold Kite | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Harrison Burton | 1 | 0.9% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Jack White | 1 | 8.3% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Jerry Nadeau | 1 | 0.5% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Jim Cook | 1 | 2.5% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Jim Hurtubise | 1 | 2.7% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Jim Roper | 1 | 50.0% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Jimmy Florian | 1 | 3.8% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | John Kieper | 1 | 6.2% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | John Rostek | 1 | 16.6% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | John Soares | 1 | 8.3% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Johnny Allen | 1 | 0.5% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Johnny Benson | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Johnny Mantz | 1 | 8.3% | 1 | 1💎 | ||||
| T144 | Johnny Rutherford | 1 | 2.8% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | JOSH BERRY | 1 | ≈1.8% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | JUSTIN HALEY | 1 | ≈0.6% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Lake Speed | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Larry Frank | 1 | 0.9% | 1 | 1💎 | ||||
| T144 | Lennie Pond | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Leon Sales | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Lloyd Moore | 1 | 2.0% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Lou Figaro | 1 | 5.8% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Mario Andretti | 1 | 7.1% | 1 | 1💎 | ||||
| T144 | Mark Donohue | 1 | 16.6% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Marvin Burke | 1 | 100% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Neil Cole | 1 | 5.2% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Norm Nelson | 1 | 20.0% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Paul Lewis | 1 | 0.8% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Paul Menard | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 1💎 | ||||
| T144 | Phil Parsons | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Regan Smith | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | 1💎 | ||||
| T144 | Richard Brickhouse | 1 | 2.5% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Ron Bouchard | 1 | 0.6% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Royce Haggerty | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Sam McQuagg | 1 | 1.6% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Shorty Rollins | 1 | 2.3% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Tommy Thompson | 1 | 4.5% | 1 | |||||
| T144 | Trevor Bayne | 1 | 0.5% | 1 | 1💎 | ||||
| T144 | Wendell Scott | 1 | 0.2% | 1 |
What did you think of this list? Where does your favorite driver rank? Let us know by joining the discussion on Discord or X, and remember to follow us on Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube for more updates!
