Trackhouse Racing Makes More Changes to Connor Zilisch’s 2025 Calendar

WATKINS GLEN, NEW YORK - SEPTEMBER 14: Connor Zilisch, driver of the #88 Carolina Carports Chevrolet, celebrates in victory lane after winning the NASCAR Xfinity Series Mission 200 at The Glen at Watkins Glen International on September 14, 2024 in Watkins Glen, New York. (Photo by Chris Graythen/Getty Images)

What’s Happening?

In yet another expansion of his original one-race NASCAR Cup Series schedule in 2025, Trackhouse Racing is adding two more races to Connor Zilisch’s 2025 NASCAR Cup Series efforts.

Zilisch will return to Cup Series action for the June 28 Quaker State 400 at Echopark Automotive Speedway, formerly known as Atlanta Motor Speedway. He will then get back behind the wheel for what is, at press time, his final scheduled race of 2025 on Aug. 10 for the Go Bowling at The Glen at Watkins Glen.

So far this year, the 18-year-old superstar has made two Cup Series starts, making his Cup Series debut at Circuit of the Americas and his Cup Series oval debut at Charlotte Motor Speedway. In his debut, Zilsich brought home 37th wrecking out and 23rd at Charlotte.

The race in Atlanta will be Zilisch’s first Cup Series race on a superspeedway-style drafting track. However, Zilisch, a road course ace, has competed well at the Glen in the past, dominating and winning last year’s ARCA Menards Series race and his NASCAR Xfinity Series debut at the track.

Background

Zilisch, who is widely considered the top prospect in all of NASCAR, is currently competing full-time in the NASCAR Xfinity Series with JR Motorsports. Despite one win and an impressive 6.5 average starting spot, Zilisch has had rather bad luck, including a race missed for injury and a lowlight, yet unlucky, 14.5 average finish.

While Zilisch earning more races will come as a pleasant surprise to most, it is more than not for Trackhouse’s Daniel Suarez, who is underperforming in a contract year. Most consider this crossroads, either promoting Zilisch or retaining Suarez from 2026, to be the key story of the 2026 NASCAR Silly Season.

What do you think about this? Let us know your opinion on Discord or X. Don’t forget that you can also follow us on InstagramFacebook, and YouTube.

Share this:

Michael Jordan’s NASCAR Impact | Driver Approvals Questioned After Decker, Cleetus Crash At Daytona

It wouldn’t be Daytona without some weird, wacky, and headline-grabbing fallout. From viral Victory Lane moments to renewed debates about driver approval, NASCAR’s biggest race once again delivered more than just on-track drama. And with Michael Jordan celebrating a Daytona 500 win, the spotlight burned brighter than it has in years.

  • Did Michael Jordan’s raw, emotional Victory Lane reaction create the most mainstream positive buzz NASCAR has seen since 2020?
  • Why did one viral clip take on a life of its own, even after Tyler Reddick addressed it publicly?
  • Has the Natalie Decker crash reignited serious concerns about NASCAR’s driver approval process?
  • And where should the line be drawn between marketing power, opportunity, and competitive fairness?

Jordan’s presence mattered. When the most iconic athlete of a generation shows genuine emotion upon winning the Daytona 500, it reminds the wider sports world that this race still matters. That kind of authentic publicity cannot be manufactured. It resonated far beyond the garage. Meanwhile, the O’Reilly Series race added fuel to another ongoing debate. The massive Decker crash, Cleetus McFarland’s Truck debut incident, and past approval inconsistencies have once again raised tough questions. Consistency, transparency, and accountability are now front and center. Add in Austin Hill’s dominance and Ryan Ellis’ career-best sixth-place run to open the season, and Daytona gave fans plenty to talk about on and off the track.

Watch Also

Adam Petty’s Brief Bright Career Ended in Heartbreak

On May 12, 2000, the NASCAR world arrived at New Hampshire International Speedway expecting another race weekend. Within hours, Adam Petty was gone. His death would become the first domino in an 18-month stretch that forever changed NASCAR’s approach to safety and reshaped the sport at its core.

  • How did a suspected throttle issue in Turn 3 at New Hampshire International Speedway take the life of 19-year-old Adam Petty?
  • Why were officials and team members unable to recreate the malfunction afterward?
  • Did this tragedy expose deeper safety flaws that had gone unaddressed?
  • And how did this moment mark the beginning of NASCAR’s most devastating modern era?

Adam wasn’t just the grandson of Richard Petty or the son of Kyle Petty; he was a young driver building his own path, fresh off his Cup debut at Texas Motor Speedway and preparing for a future with Dodge and Petty Enterprises. His passing stunned the garage and deeply impacted fans who saw the Petty family as part of their own. From the unanswered mechanical questions to the emotional aftermath that eventually led to the creation of Victory Junction, this is where the Firestorm begins. The fear, the controversy, and the transformation of NASCAR safety all trace back to that Friday in Loudon.

Watch Also

Does NASCAR Need Better Quality Control?

The O’Reilly series race at Daytona turned into a breaking point. One crash, one late reaction, and suddenly the conversation wasn’t just about race results, it was about standards, accountability, and who truly belongs at this level of NASCAR competition.

  • After the crash involving Natalie Decker and Sam Mayer, is this just another racing mistake, or proof that NASCAR needs stricter quality control before drivers reach national series events?
  • Was NASCAR right to previously deny Mike Wallace a Daytona 500 start at Daytona International Speedway, even with his experience?
  • Does Chris Wright’s repeated inexperience at high-speed tracks show a flaw in how seats are earned?
  • And where does Cleetus McFarland fit, promising upside, but possibly moving up too quickly?

The Decker incident reignited long-standing perception issues, especially when outside commentary from figures like Mike Davis amplified the embarrassment factor. At the same time, NASCAR has stepped in before, blocking Wallace, sidelining others like Jennifer Jo Cobb, yet those interventions feel inconsistent. Wright’s pit road mistake added fuel to the argument that funding can outweigh readiness. McFarland, meanwhile, represents a different case, raw but potentially coachable, with time to develop if he chooses that route seriously. Money has always shaped racing careers, but when sponsorship outweighs preparation, the sport risks its credibility. Should NASCAR tighten its standards, or is this simply the cost of doing business in modern motorsports?

Watch Also