How Durable Is the Next-Gen Car? Comparing How Many Drivers Finish Races

CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA - NOVEMBER 18: Kurt Busch and Martin Truex Jr. drive the NASCAR Next Gen car during the NASCAR Cup Series test at Charlotte Motor Speedway on November 18, 2020 in Concord, North Carolina. (Photo by Jared C. Tilton/Getty Images)

What’s Happening?

When the Next-Gen car was introduced, one of its selling points was durability. The car was meant to be more reliable and easy to fix to help teams cut costs. Well, how much more durable is the car? The best way to analyze this is how many cars are finishing races with the Next-Gen car.

  • We will look at how many cars on average fail to finish races during the Next-Gen era. We will also break down the reasons for these cars failing to finish, whether it be a mechanical failure, crash, or engine failure. This will be based on the listed reason for a driver failing to finish a race on Racing Reference.
  • This will be compared to the final two seasons of the Gen-6 car to see how much of an improvement there has been from the previous generation to the newest generation of cars.
  • While the Next-Gen car is a controversial topic amongst fans, it’s important to look at every aspect of the car. Is it as durable as it was hoped to be?

Next-Gen Car: 2022-2023

Here is a breakdown of how many cars failed to finish races throughout 2021. Most of the reasons were for crashes, but there were a few mechanical failures and engine failures mixed in as well. The most notable trend is that mechanical and engine failures only accounted for 21 of 164 DNFs in 2023.

  • Total DNFs: (224 in 2022) (164 in 2023) (388 Total)
  • Crashes/DVP/Other: (162 in 2022) (133 in 2023) (305 Total)
  • Mechanical Failures: (41 in 2022) (14 in 2023) (55 Total)
  • Engine Failures: (21 in 2022) (7 in 2023) (28 Total)

Here is a rundown of the average amount of DNFs per race each season since the Next-Gen car was introduced. This gives fans a better idea of how many drivers fail to finish for different reasons per race.

  • Total DNFs: (6.3 in 2022) (4.6 in 2023) (5.3 Total)
  • Crashes/DVP/Other: (4.5 in 2022) (3.7 in 2023) (4.2 Total)
  • Mechanical Failures: (1.1 in 2022) (0.4 in 2023) (0.8 Total)
  • Engine Failures: (0.6 in 2022) (0.2 in 2023) (0.4 Total)

Engine failures in particular happen on average every 2-3 races in the Next-Gen era. In 2023, that went down to every 5 races or so. Mechanical failures went from happening in every race in 2022 to happening around every other race in 2023.

Gen-6 Car: 2020-2021

Now, let’s compare those numbers to 2020 and 2021 with the Gen-6 car. In total, DNFs were not too far off from where they were in 2023. However, mechanical failures and engine failures in both years were far more prevalent than they were in 2023. Crashes are generally more prevalent in the Next-Gen era, which is down to the Next-Gen car being tougher to drive.

  • Total DNFs: (175 in 2020) (169 in 2021) (344 Total)
  • Crashes/DVP/Other: (108 in 2020) (121 in 2021) (229 Total)
  • Mechanical Failures: (53 in 2020) (27 in 2021) (80 Total)
  • Engine Failures: (14 in 2020) (21 in 2021) (35 Total)

Now, let’s take a look at the averages for 2020 and 2021. Again, this gives an idea of how often these things happened per race.

  • Total DNFs: (4.9 in 2020) (4.7 in 2023) (4.8 Total)
  • Crashes/DVP/Other: (3.0 in 2022) (3.4 in 2023) (3.2 Total)
  • Mechanical Failures: (1.5 in 2022) (0.8 in 2023) (1.1 Total)
  • Engine Failures: (0.4 in 2022) (0.6 in 2023) (0.5 Total)

Overall, engine failures and mechanical failures have gone down from the Gen-6 era. In the Gen-6 era, engine failures on average happened every other race with mechanical failures happening roughly every race.

Compare that to 2023, where mechanical failures happen roughly every 2-3 races and engine failures every 5 or so races. Overall, the Next-Gen car is not having as many parts failures as the Gen-6 car did.

How Durable is the Next-Gen Car?

Based on these statistics, this car is significantly more durable than the Gen-6 car. Engine failures and mechanical failures are far less prevalent. While 2022, was a bit rocky, 2023 saw a major drop. When it comes to how durable the Next-Gen car is, NASCAR seems to have accomplished that goal.

Share this:

iRacing Drops First Look at its New NASCAR Ram Truck

What’s Happening?

iRacing has finally given NASCAR fans a first look at the in-game model of the NASCAR Ram Truck slated to join the racing sim’s lineup in the near future.

iRacing released this new render, alongside some other NASCAR news, in their latest Development Update blog ahead of its 2026 Season 2 launch.

Though iRacing says the Ram model is still pending approvals, this announcement marks a major milestone for Ram in its 2026 return to NASCAR, as this is the first appearance the brand will make in motorsports gaming in well over a decade.

Of course, the next major question facing Ram will be its inclusion in iRacing’s next edition of their console-based NASCAR game series, which most expect to be titled NASCAR 26.

iRacing was open about its use of models from its self-titled subscription-based online racing service for NASCAR 25. But, as of press time, they have yet to announce any details about the next game, although it’s fair for players to assume the Ram model used for iRacing will likely be used in the next NASCAR console game.

The NASCAR news for iRacing Season 2 didn’t stop at Ram, as iRacing also confirmed that the Grand Prix of St. Petersburg, a new addition to the NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series schedule in 2026, will join its track list during Season 2.

iRacing also confirmed tweaks to the in-game physics of both the NASCAR O’Reilly Auto Parts Series, focused on updating the series’ in-game drafting model.

But the biggest news of all (beyond Ram, of course) is that iRacing plans to have NASCAR’s San Diego Street Circuit at Naval Base Coronado ready for play before the end of the 2026 season, with the Development Update claiming they are targeting a release date sometime in June.

What do you think about this? Let us know your opinion on Discord or X. Don’t forget that you can also follow us on InstagramFacebook, and YouTube.

How Much Did Ty Gibbs Benefit from Chris Gabehart in 2025?

What’s Happening?

Former Joe Gibbs Racing Crew Chief and Competition Director Chris Gabehart is claiming in court documents that he was “pressured” to be Ty Gibbs’ Crew Chief for a small portion of the 2025 season. While this partnership didn’t last long, the stats suggest that Gabehart could have been a difference maker for the young driver’s 2025 season.

In just six seasons as a NASCAR Cup Series Crew Chief at Joe Gibbs Racing, Chris Gabehart delivered the team 22 NASCAR Cup Series wins, including back-to-back Daytona 500 wins, all with driver Denny Hamlin.

His time as Crew Chief came to an end last season, when Gabehart was seemingly promoted to Competition Director, which most assumed would be his new long-term post at the team.

Surprisingly, this was not the case, as at year’s end, despite 13 wins, 47 top fives, and 69 top tens for the team’s cars, Gabehart left the team for Spire Motorsports under mysterious circumstances.

While things had seemed odd for Gabehart during his short tenure as Competition Director, including a stretch in which he served as a de facto Crew Chief for Ty Gibbs, it seemed that the transition to a new role at JGR had been a winning move for the team.

This drama came to a head last week, when JGR filed a lawsuit against Gabehart, alleging that the former employee used various methods to steal information, such as car setups to give to his new employer.

Though Gabehart has denied any wrongdoing, he leveled a few allegations of his own against JGR in a court filing Wednesday afternoon.

“A Dysfunctional Organizational Structure That I Could Not Continue In”

In his filing, Gabehart accused JGR of misleading him in his new role, saying that he found himself answering to JGR leadership and members of the Gibbs family “when making even routine competition decisions.”

“I was promised a COO-type role overseeing all competitive operations with autonomy to lead. Instead, I found myself constantly intertwined with Coach Gibbs, senior JGR executives, and family members when making even routine competition decisions—a dysfunctional organizational structure that I could not continue in.” — Chris Gabehart.

Nonetheless, the NASCAR community’s major takeaway from this filing was Gabehart’s claims about his time serving as Crew Chief for Joe Gibbs’ grandson Ty Gibbs in 2025.

Gabehart says that Joe Gibbs “repeatedly pressured me to take over as crew chief of the No. 54 car.”

The veteran shot caller claims he finally gave in to these pleas during the summer, taking over for Crew Chief Tyler Allen at the June 28, 2025, race at EchoPark Speedway, before leaving this post after the Regular Season Finale at Daytona, tallying nine total races atop the No. 54’s pit box.

“Despite my objections, Coach Gibbs and ownership continued pressing, and I eventually conceded to the pressure by first helping the No. 54 team more behind the scenes and then, beginning on June 28, 2025, by publicly serving as the crew chief and calling the races on Sundays for nine consecutive races before returning those duties to the original crew chief, Tyler Allen, against the strong desires of ownership, when I made it clear that I did not want to serve as a crew chief for the long term.” — Chris Gabehart.

During this stretch of races, fans could hear Gabehart over Gibbs’ radio during this time, though, at least initially for that first listed date at EchoPark, JGR claimed that he was serving as a race strategist for the No. 54 team, though this could have been the case for this one race.

Nonetheless, despite Gabehart’s claims, the entry lists for that nine-race stretch list Allen as the Crew Chief for the No. 54.

Ultimately, his relationship with the team continued to sour after his time as the No. 54 Crew Chief, with Gabehart alleging that Ty Gibbs was not held to the same standards as other JGR team members, including things such as required meeting attendance.

“I also identified specific examples of the No. 54 team’s differential treatment that undermined my position as Competition Director. For example, key personnel decisions were made without my counsel or input despite my role as Competition Director; and critically the No. 54 driver was not held to the same meeting attendance standards as others on the team.” — Chris Gabehart

While Gibbs did not win races or make the playoffs with Gabehart on the pit box, one could wonder how the team fared during this stretch and whether or not Gabehart gave it his all in what he claims was a high-pressure situation.

How Did The Gabehart and Gibbs Combo Do?

Though Gabehart was never officially listed as the Crew Chief of the No. 54 on NASCAR entry lists, given the timeline supplied in this filing, it’s easy to piece together what races Gabehart alleges he and Gibbs worked together.

Gabehart claims he started this role on June 28, 2025, which was race 18 of the 2025 season at EchoPark Speedway, and stayed in this spot for nine races, which would end his tenure with race 26 of the season at Daytona on August 23, 2025.

Entering that first race at EchoPark, through the first 17 races of 2025, the No. 54 team sat 23rd in points, with just two top fives, three top tens, and an average finish of 19.4.

In the alleged nine-race stretch with Gabehart atop the pit box, Gibbs scored two top-fives and four top tens, winning the inaugural NASCAR In-Season Challenge and improving his average finish to 17.7 (14.3 during Gabehart’s nine races with Gibbs).

So, did Gibbs continue his improved form after Gabehart left his post as Crew Chief?

Well, the easy answer is no, as in the final ten races of the season, after Gabehart left, Gibbs would score just one more top five, three more top tens, and tally an average finish of 18.4.

Putting aside all the drama that has come from Gabehart’s time as JGR Competition Director and part-time Crew Chief for Ty Gibbs, it seems that Joe Gibbs was right to push for this pairing.

Nonetheless, with the alleged pressure for Gabehart to add this job to his list of duties at JGR, and his now well-known feelings about the No. 54 team, it seems this pairing was destined to split up from the start.

Let us know your thoughts on this! Join the discussion on Discord or X, and remember to follow us on InstagramFacebook, and YouTube for more updates. 

Gabehart Fires Back at JGR, Says Ty Gibbs Not Held to Same Standards as Other Drivers

The legal fight between Joe Gibbs Racing and former competition director Chris Gabehart just escalated, and now it’s not just about data. In his official response, Gabehart pushed back hard against the restraining order request… and made serious claims about dysfunction surrounding the No. 54 team and its driver, Ty Gibbs.

  • Did Chris Gabehart actually misuse confidential JGR information — or is this retaliation for leaving?
  • Why does he describe the organization as “dysfunctional” behind the scenes?
  • Was the No. 54 team treated differently than the rest of the JGR lineup?
  • And what does this mean for JGR’s culture and leadership moving forward?

In his filing, Gabehart denies sharing any trade secrets and says forensic reviews back that up. But the bombshell allegations focus on internal structure, claiming the 54 car was managed directly by ownership and not held to the same standards as other teams. Those comments pull back the curtain on tensions many fans only speculated about, especially after last season’s on-track friction involving teammates like Denny Hamlin. If this heads toward trial, more details could surface. If it settles, we may never get the full picture. Either way, the public back-and-forth has already shifted perception, and how this plays out could impact not just one team, but how authority, accountability, and information are handled across the garage.

Watch Also: