Dale Jr Calls a Potential Fourth Stage at Superspeedways a “Nothing Burger”

What’s Happening?

During the latest episode of the Dale Jr Download, NASCAR legend Dale Earnhardt Jr addressed recent talks that NASCAR could add a fourth stage to superspeedway races, calling an additional stage a “nothing burger.”

Though there is still some time before the NASCAR Cup Series returns to a superspeedway, the conversation surrounding the aggressive fuel-saving strategies of teams remains a hot-button issue.

During these races, to maintain track position, teams find themselves doing everything they can to save fuel and, in turn, save time on pit road during green flag pit stops. This strategy, though effective, can lead to slow on-track speeds in the already gridlocked field.

This conversation has reignited thanks to comments from NASCAR’s Managing Director of Communications, Mike Forde, during last week’s episode of NASCAR’s in-house podcast Hauler Talk. During that episode, Forde said NASCAR officials have discussed, but not in a serious manner, adding a fourth stage to races on Superspeedways.

Though the idea of this change received pushback from fans online, it is a solution that is often suggested to terminate the fuel-saving strategy from these races. One supporter of this idea is NASCAR Hall of Famer and superspeedway ace Dale Earnhardt Jr, who spoke on Ford’s comments during the latest episode of The Dale Jr Download.

Earnhardt had suggested the idea of adding a fourth stage to races in recent episodes, but responded to the backlash from fans during Tuesday’s edition, standing by his support for adding a fourth stage, saying, “Is it the best solution? No. Is it the the perfect solution? It is not.”

In Earnhardt’s opinion, if NASCAR adds a fourth stage, spaced out to eliminate any potential green flag stops in the early portion of the race, it will create the on-track action fans want to see. “If you say, ‘Hey, we’re gonna have 40 laps, you don’t need fuel, race your ass off,'” Earnhardt said. “I think you’re gonna have more action.”

The Hall of Famer also clarified that he understands people are not fans of the idea of the fourth stage, but, in his eyes, it’s a “nothing burger,” comparing the idea to the only race that currently has a fourth stage, the Coca-Cola 600.

“I know that everyone doesn’t love this idea of the fourth stage, but I’m telling you, it’s a nothing burger because we don’t look at the 600 and go, ‘ah damn, that fourth stage.’ Nobody even cares. . . I don’t think anybody even picks up on the idea that it’s even in there. You know what I mean?” — Dale Earnhardt Jr.

While Earnhardt suggests that it could be overlooked, the way some overlook, and maybe even forget, the Coca-Cola 600 has four stages, even the idea of adding a fourth stage at Daytona and Talladega has fans up in arms.

Adding a Fourth Stage?

While the concept of stage racing is still relatively new to a sport that is over 70 years old, the debate surrounding adding a fourth stage is a heated one, with fans suggesting their own solutions to fixing the current state of superspeedway racing in NASCAR.

Of course, some fans are quick to say ‘fix the car,’ pointing to the passing issues that the NASCAR Next Gen car has on superspeedways, though this take is often spammed whenever conversations around the quality of racing come to the forefront.

The main opposition to the addition of the fourth stage is those who suggest getting rid of the stage breaks and still awarding points, something NASCAR did at road courses in 2023, though they reversed course shortly after. The idea behind this is that teams will be less inclined to save fuel with the subtraction of those two-stage cautions.

Earnhardt pushes back at this idea, saying that he does not think that is on the table for NASCAR, though “I would try to use whatever influence we have here to support that.”

But, even though he says he would support that if it were on the table, it’s clear that he thinks this is not the solution that will fix the fuel-saving problem, saying:

“If you take the cautions away from the stage breaks themselves, take them out, you’re still gonna have guys that are gonna sit in the draft, save, save, save, save, save, to knock a couple seconds off of that final stop and leapfrog the field.” — Dale Earnhardt Jr.

Nonetheless, NASCAR has yet to announce the addition of fourth stages to superspeedways for October’s race at Talladega or the four races at Daytona and Talladega in 2026, as, once again, Forde said during Hauler Talk, these discussions were not “seriously discussed.”

What do you think about this? Let us know your opinion on Discord or X. Don’t forget that you can also follow us on InstagramFacebook, and YouTube.

Share this:

Michael Jordan’s NASCAR Impact | Driver Approvals Questioned After Decker, Cleetus Crash At Daytona

It wouldn’t be Daytona without some weird, wacky, and headline-grabbing fallout. From viral Victory Lane moments to renewed debates about driver approval, NASCAR’s biggest race once again delivered more than just on-track drama. And with Michael Jordan celebrating a Daytona 500 win, the spotlight burned brighter than it has in years.

  • Did Michael Jordan’s raw, emotional Victory Lane reaction create the most mainstream positive buzz NASCAR has seen since 2020?
  • Why did one viral clip take on a life of its own, even after Tyler Reddick addressed it publicly?
  • Has the Natalie Decker crash reignited serious concerns about NASCAR’s driver approval process?
  • And where should the line be drawn between marketing power, opportunity, and competitive fairness?

Jordan’s presence mattered. When the most iconic athlete of a generation shows genuine emotion upon winning the Daytona 500, it reminds the wider sports world that this race still matters. That kind of authentic publicity cannot be manufactured. It resonated far beyond the garage. Meanwhile, the O’Reilly Series race added fuel to another ongoing debate. The massive Decker crash, Cleetus McFarland’s Truck debut incident, and past approval inconsistencies have once again raised tough questions. Consistency, transparency, and accountability are now front and center. Add in Austin Hill’s dominance and Ryan Ellis’ career-best sixth-place run to open the season, and Daytona gave fans plenty to talk about on and off the track.

Watch Also

Adam Petty’s Brief Bright Career Ended in Heartbreak

On May 12, 2000, the NASCAR world arrived at New Hampshire International Speedway expecting another race weekend. Within hours, Adam Petty was gone. His death would become the first domino in an 18-month stretch that forever changed NASCAR’s approach to safety and reshaped the sport at its core.

  • How did a suspected throttle issue in Turn 3 at New Hampshire International Speedway take the life of 19-year-old Adam Petty?
  • Why were officials and team members unable to recreate the malfunction afterward?
  • Did this tragedy expose deeper safety flaws that had gone unaddressed?
  • And how did this moment mark the beginning of NASCAR’s most devastating modern era?

Adam wasn’t just the grandson of Richard Petty or the son of Kyle Petty; he was a young driver building his own path, fresh off his Cup debut at Texas Motor Speedway and preparing for a future with Dodge and Petty Enterprises. His passing stunned the garage and deeply impacted fans who saw the Petty family as part of their own. From the unanswered mechanical questions to the emotional aftermath that eventually led to the creation of Victory Junction, this is where the Firestorm begins. The fear, the controversy, and the transformation of NASCAR safety all trace back to that Friday in Loudon.

Watch Also

Does NASCAR Need Better Quality Control?

The O’Reilly series race at Daytona turned into a breaking point. One crash, one late reaction, and suddenly the conversation wasn’t just about race results, it was about standards, accountability, and who truly belongs at this level of NASCAR competition.

  • After the crash involving Natalie Decker and Sam Mayer, is this just another racing mistake, or proof that NASCAR needs stricter quality control before drivers reach national series events?
  • Was NASCAR right to previously deny Mike Wallace a Daytona 500 start at Daytona International Speedway, even with his experience?
  • Does Chris Wright’s repeated inexperience at high-speed tracks show a flaw in how seats are earned?
  • And where does Cleetus McFarland fit, promising upside, but possibly moving up too quickly?

The Decker incident reignited long-standing perception issues, especially when outside commentary from figures like Mike Davis amplified the embarrassment factor. At the same time, NASCAR has stepped in before, blocking Wallace, sidelining others like Jennifer Jo Cobb, yet those interventions feel inconsistent. Wright’s pit road mistake added fuel to the argument that funding can outweigh readiness. McFarland, meanwhile, represents a different case, raw but potentially coachable, with time to develop if he chooses that route seriously. Money has always shaped racing careers, but when sponsorship outweighs preparation, the sport risks its credibility. Should NASCAR tighten its standards, or is this simply the cost of doing business in modern motorsports?

Watch Also