How Do SAFER Barriers Work?

TALLADEGA, ALABAMA - OCTOBER 02: Sam Mayer, driver of the #8 QPS Employment Group Chevrolet, and AJ Allmendinger, driver of the #16 Gold Fish Casino Slots Chevrolet, spin into the SAFER barrier after an on-track incident during the NASCAR Xfinity Series Sparks 300 at Talladega Superspeedway on October 02, 2021 in Talladega, Alabama. (Photo by Brian Lawdermilk/Getty Images)

What’s Happening?

This month 22 years ago, SAFER Barriers were installed for the first time at Indianapolis Motor Speedway. It revolutionized one of the most basic, yet important, parts of race tracks, retaining walls. What is it that makes SAFER Barriers so unique, and how do they work?

  • SAFER Barriers were invented following the multiple tragedies in NASCAR throughout the 2000 and 2001 seasons. They are now standard for every oval track throughout the world.
  • SAFER Barriers were a natural evolution from the walls already put up around race tracks. Throughout the years, the construction of the walls has changed very little, but, the walls were installed more and more across race tracks.
  • Fans love the SAFER Barriers due, and how they have revolutionized driver safety. SAFER barriers have saved drivers’ lives and prevented multiple injuries.

The Background of Introducing SAFER Barriers

Retaining walls have an interesting history in motorsports. In the early days, tracks would come up with their own solutions. Popular ones included guardrails, wood planks, or, sometimes, no wall at all if there was nothing outside of the track in that area.

The most common type of barrier was guardrails, similar to those on a typical roadway. The problem with guardrails was they were too weak to support certain impacts. One example of this was Lee Petty and Johnny Beauchamp’s crash at Daytona in 1961.

Concrete walls were much stronger and soon became the standard for retaining walls across NASCAR. At the time, the focus was on keeping cars on the track and not bursting through walls, which is what concrete walls do well. Pocono Raceway used a different material, iron boilerplate, for a while, but, eventually, concrete walls were installed.

While the concrete was great at keeping cars on the race track, the walls were a bit too strong. Instead of absorbing the energy from a hard impact, the energy was dispersed throughout the car, which meant the driver took the brunt of the impact. This played a role in Dale Earnhardt’s fatal crash at Daytona in 2001.

NASCAR made significant changes in the following months, most notably implementing the HANS device in race cars, but, Indianapolis Motor Speedway took a different approach. They partnered with University of Nebraska-Lincoln’s Dean Sicking to invent a new retaining wall. That’s where the Steel and Foam Energy Reduction (SAFER) Barrier was invented, and it was quickly implemented at tracks across the country.

How SAFER Barriers Work

SAFER Barriers are designed to absorb the energy from hard impacts. Whereas concrete walls were firm and did not move at all, SAFER Barriers were designed to flex a little bit, but, not too much to where the wall would break apart on impact.

This is accomplished via a solid steel wall placed in front of the outer concrete wall. Steel is fairly flexible, but, hard to break apart. Between the steel wall and the concrete wall, energy-absorbant foam blocks are placed to brace the concrete wall and the steel barrier.

The result is that the wall flexes when a car impacts it, absorbing the energy from the accident instead of throwing it back to the car and the driver. Ryan Blaney’s crash at Daytona in 2023 showcases just how much the barrier flexes.

NASCAR has suffered zero fatalities since 2001, and a lot of that can be attributed to SAFER Barriers. Indianapolis Motor Speedway hasn’t seen a fatality on its’ oval layout since Tony Renna’s fatal crash in 2003.

From there, SAFER Barriers became the standard for retaining walls across the country. Iowa Speedway became the first track to be built with SAFER Barriers installed from day 1 when the track opened in 2006.

The Addition of SAFER Barriers

In the early days of SAFER Barriers, the “Soft walls”, as they were also called at the time, were only added in areas where crashes were most common. Tracks often had them in the corners, but, straightaway walls or inside retaining walls were often left unprotected.

Drivers would find these places to hit, which caused some major issues. This all came to a head in 2015 at Daytona, where Kyle Busch hit the inside concrete wall head-on, and broke his leg.

Soon afterward, NASCAR and drivers began pushing for SAFER barriers to be added all around the race track. Gradually, tracks began to add SAFER Barriers around the entire track.

Nowadays, it’s rare for a wall at an oval track to not include SAFER Barriers. However, exposed walls do still exist here and there, and Ryan Blaney found one at Nashville in 2023.

SAFER Barriers are now the standard retaining wall on local tracks across the country. They have saved lives and prevented major injuries.

Share this:

MADISON, ILLINOIS - JUNE 01: Denny Hamlin, driver of the #11 Yahoo! Toyota, and crew chief Christopher Gabehart talk on the grid during qualifying for the NASCAR Cup Series Enjoy Illinois 300 at WWT Raceway on June 01, 2024 in Madison, Illinois. (Photo by Logan Riely/Getty Images)

JGR Lawsuit: What Confidential Information Was Allegedly Taken?

What’s Happening?

Joe Gibbs Racing alleged that former competition director Chris Gabehart took a wide range of confidential team information regarding competitive performance data, engineering processes, financial records, and internal personnel details. But what exactly do the documents say was taken?

  • Performance, payroll, and financial data stored on personal devices: The lawsuit claims that numerous internal photos were saved to Gabehart’s personal phone and Google Photos account, which JGR says were not approved for confidential storage and were accessible to third parties, including his spouse. These images allegedly included post-race audits for the entire 2025 season, detailed team payroll information with contracts and compensation structures, tools for projecting employee pay, driver salaries for multiple seasons, sponsor and partner revenue figures, pit crew analytics, and tire performance analyses.
  • Extensive race analytics and proprietary setup files: Within the “Spire” folder, JGR says investigators found deeply technical documents tied to competitive performance. This allegedly included 140+ pages of post-race data analysis from a 2025 Las Vegas event detailing what metrics the team measures and how it measures them, as well as more than 20 “eLap” files generated by proprietary software. These reports incorporate inputs from hundreds of employees, historical databases, and simulation work to determine optimal racecar setups, which means it effectively represents the culmination of years of institutional knowledge.
  • Driver feedback systems and engineering intelligence: The complaint also references internal post-race debrief surveys completed by drivers after each event, which document both subjective feedback and structured data collection. Additional documents allegedly covered proprietary engine output information and recommended gear-shift points, along with photos of racecar diffuser skirts showing damage after a 2025 race.
  • Tire strategy, logistics, and fuel-modeling methods: Several documents reportedly describe how JGR selects, manages, and cycles tires during races. Others detail initiatives for transporting equipment and racecars more efficiently while improving communication among engineers. The filing also mentions proprietary fuel-mileage estimation models for both JGR drivers and competitors, including methods used to refine accuracy during races.
  • Compensation records and competitive performance comparisons: Investigators allegedly found spreadsheets listing base salaries and bonus structures for key team personnel, along with documents comparing a JGR driver’s performance at a specific race to that of a Spire driver using JGR’s proprietary analytical tools. JGR argues that both categories of information are highly sensitive.
  • Alleged recruitment of JGR personnel: In addition to the data itself, Gabehart allegedly attempted to recruit JGR employees to join him at Spire. The complaint states that he had access to payroll information for all drivers and employees, which JGR suggests could have supported those efforts. According to the filing, at least one employee has already left JGR for Spire.

What JGR Is Seeking From the Lawsuit

JGR states it is entitled to damages believed to exceed $8 million, potentially subject to enhancement, along with attorneys’ fees. The organization is also seeking multiple forms of relief, expected to exceed that amount, as well as a cease-and-desist order to prevent any use or disclosure of what it describes as trade secrets.

You can learn more about the lawsuit itself, the circumstances surrounding Gabehart’s departure, and the broader allegations in the article linked below

NASCAR isn’t nerdy enough…

NASCAR isn’t nerdy enough. Not in a cringe way, not in a gimmicky way, but in a way that could quietly and organically grow the sport. After a Daytona weekend filled with spectacle and nostalgia, DJ Yee believes there’s a bigger opportunity sitting right in front of NASCAR, one that doesn’t change the racing at all but could completely change how fans engage with it.

  • Is NASCAR leaving storytelling power on the table by hiding deeper data?
  • Could advanced stats create year-round narratives the sport desperately needs?
  • Why do sports like baseball thrive on analytics while NASCAR stays surface-level?
  • And what if fans could choose to dive deeper without it affecting casual viewers at all?

Other leagues have turned analytics into conversation fuel. In baseball, stars like Aaron Judge and Shohei Ohtani aren’t loud personalities, but advanced metrics tell their story anyway. NASCAR, meanwhile, has mountains of telemetry data but shares very little of it in a meaningful way. Throttle traces, brake usage, steering inputs, tire wear models, fuel efficiency ratings, clean air percentages, and even a “positions above replacement” type metric, the possibilities are endless. None of it would intrude on the racing. Casual fans could ignore it. But hardcore fans, creators, and analysts would suddenly have tools to build deeper narratives around drivers and performance.

Watch Also

NASCAR Needs To Keep Doing This!

For the first time in a while, it feels like NASCAR fans see a bigger light at the end of the tunnel. The start of 2026 has brought real optimism, from improved racing to sharper marketing, and even an 11 percent bump for the Daytona 500 to 7.5 million viewers. After a rough couple of seasons, that kind of stability matters. The question now is simple, is this momentum real or just a honeymoon phase?

  • Is NASCAR finally leaning into what makes the sport fun instead of forcing gimmicks?
  • Are driver personality promos building future stars the right way?
  • Does embracing the sport’s identity matter more than chasing casual viewers?
  • And most importantly, can NASCAR stay consistent long enough for growth to stick?

There’s been a noticeable shift. The marketing feels more modern without feeling fake. Broadcasts are embracing energy and meme culture without losing authenticity. Social media efforts are spotlighting drivers and personalities in ways that echo how legends like Dale Earnhardt Jr., Jeff Gordon, and Tony Stewart once drew fans in. NASCAR’s identity has always been edge, personality, and grassroots simplicity, and recent changes feel closer to that core. But none of it matters without patience. Jaret believes the foundation may be stronger right now, but consistency will decide whether this is a spark or a true turning point.

Watch Also